This would have been consistent with the very fast load changing capabilities of the joint load control system installed in June. Both the turbine hall and engine rooms were flooded, and a collapsed ceiling contributed to 9 The sayano shushenskaya hydroelectric disaster report the 10 turbines at the site being damaged or destroyed.
Alexander Gokhman and Dr. However that was not the case for everyone as 75 personnel were pronounced dead when trapped in the turbine hall. Moderate electrical and mechanical damage. Management Team Wrong Judgement Beside technical flaw, management also held responsibility on disaster.
Environmental Impact A day after the accident, the Natural Resources Ministry of Russia claimed that an industrial oil spillage caused by disaster had spread over 80 km along the Yenisei River.
This does not give one a positive feeling about the overall balance of the system design. Completely destroyed, with extreme damage to the concrete structures around them.
At the time of the accident in the territory of the SSH there were about people, including repair and hired staff, most of them were workers who were working either on turbine gallery or in the flooded rooms.
According to the report, Unit 2 started having problems shortly after its installation due to defects in its seals and shaft vibrations. Some of them were later caught and rescued, but unfortunately some were not. Had these limits not been established or been violated in practice, consequences as dire as those experienced on 17 August could have occurred.
The reports of severe vibration in Unit 2 suggest possible causes for the initial load rejection that apparently precipitated this massive failure. Thus, during the period between the Unit 2 load rejection and the Unit 7 load rejection, Unit 7 would have experienced a significant load acceptance transient.
Occasionally, this has resulted in cases where draft tube column separation has occurred causing loud banging sounds, pressure spikes, and sometimes damage to the machines. The Siberian Unified Dispatching Control Centre UDCC made the decision to start turbine 2 at the Sayano-shushenskaya plant and switch it to regulating mode immediately as cover for the Bratsk plant even though it was halted due to the extensive vibrations.
Conclusion Similar accident is likely to occur again in future, at somewhere people putting economic concerns before human life safety factors., —ё,…,…-… On 9 September at The steel gates to the water intake pipes of the turbines, weighing tonnes long tons; short tons each, were closed manually by opening the valves with hydraulic jacks keeping them up   between 8: Kolesnikov , was that the accident was caused by the seizure of either the turbine bearing or the upper runner seals causing a very large twisting force to be transmitted to the head cover.
The restoration process was finances by the RusHydrds equity capital and also by raising 4, Full penstock head was then released into the turbine pit, resulting in an enormous geyser and massive destruction. It was even more puzzling why the order came years after the plant had actually been operating.
Throughoutnumerous problems with seals, turbine shaft vibrations and bearings surfaced. Valentina Gulina, an equipment engineer working in the turbine hall, describes the nightmare that followed. Instead, the hydraulic thrust would have to have been reduced or eliminated prior to the failure, implying a shutdown.
The steel gates to the water intake pipes of the turbines, weighing tonnes long tons; short tons each, were closed manually by opening the valves with hydraulic jacks keeping them up   between 8: SSH chief engineer later ordered to close all head gates manually.
The problem was observed many times and yet the load on Turbine 2 was not reduced. The directors and management board should make sure to never neglect and ignore even a small problem with the operation.
There are also programs to support these children in kindergartens and schools and to provide higher education. Rocks and pieces of metal went flying, we started to dodge them… At that point the corrugated cover was nearly at roof level, and the roof itself had been destroyed… I made a mental calculation: It shows the relative locations and sizes of intakes, penstocks, turbines, generators, transformers and power take-off facilities.
When this band is exceeded the turbines will begin to vibrate due to the force of water flow.Sep 26, · The hydroelectric power station is located on the Yenisei River, near Sayanogorsk in Khakassia, Russia. Before the accident, it was the largest power plant in Russia and the sixth-largest hydroelectric plant in the world.
According to this report, on 17 August at AM (local time) there was a fire at the hydroelectric power station of Bratsk which broke both communications and the automatic driving systems of other power plants in the region, including Sayano–Shushenskaya. The situation was recovered on 17 August at Sayano-Shushenskaya, DoL: 17 August 19 Sayano-Shushenskaya was a wake-up call In the government requested an investigation of 60 medium -sized and large hydroelectric plants in Russia.
Sayano Shushenskaya accident – presenting a possible direct cause It has now been over a year since the catastrophic accident at the huge Sayano Shushenskaya Dam and Hydroelectric Station in southern Siberia which cost the lives of 75 people and nearly destroyed the MW powerhouse.
It issued an extensive report on 3 October. Sayano-Shushenskaya Hydroelectric Power Station Accident 2. 0 Root Factors On August 17th,the Sayana-shushenskaya powerplant suffered a massive accident that resulted in the flooding of the engine and turbine rooms and two electric generators to explode underwater due to short circuit.
The 6,MW Sayano-Shushenskaya hydro plant (bottom left) was to be the largest in the world when construction began in The 10th and last MW hydro turbine was placed into service inDownload